Astrophotography

The night sky in this area is amazing. There isn’t a major city for miles around so there is NO light pollution. I mean none. When I turn the lights off in the house, everything goes black, which makes for incredible stargazing. When I was a kid, my Dad would bring a telescope up here and we’d head to an open field down the street to have a look. I have a fond memories of these nights, out in the intervale with my Dad.

Knowing this, I decided to try my hand at astrophotography – the formal name for star photography – while I’m up here to see if I could get any decent results. It was harder than I would have guessed, and incredibly time consuming. My exposures ranged anywhere from 30 seconds to 30+minutes, and with “long exposure noise reduction” on, that time was effectively doubled for each shot. Considering I didn’t get to start shooting until 10:30pm when the sky was pitch black, I wasn’t able to get more than an exposure or two each night before I needed to go to bed.

FIRST ATTEMPT

For my very first shot I decided to take a simple star point shot (no trails) to see if my set up looked good. I set the exposure to 30 seconds, got my flashlight out to “paint” the trees with light and took my shot. Here it is:

Five Finger Point 2-3-2

Alright, everything looked pretty good and I was in business. I decided to recompose to have the trees appear across the bottom of the frame (as opposed to the corner) and set the exposure to “bulb.” This time I would take a 10 minute exposure and get some decent star trails…or so I thought. I pressed the shutter release, painted the trees a bit and walked away from the camera. Here’s the results of that second shot, the first of my star trail exposures.

Five Finger Point 2-5-2

After this shot it was pretty clear I didn’t know what I was doing. It was pitch black when I tried to recompose the shot, and I couldn’t see anything in the viewfinder. I knew I wanted to include some of the trees across the bottom of the frame, so I composed the shot by putting the blackest blobs at the bottom of the frame and crossed my fingers. I used my flashlight again to “paint” the trees in the foreground with light, but I didn’t know exactly what parts of the trees would be in the frame so I missed some spots. And I also created some really nasty harsh shadows (see lower left corner). I vaguely knew that I should be pointing the camera to the north, but when I saw this result I remembered why. In the northern hemisphere the rotation of the earth is such that star trails will appear to be rotating around the north star. Aha! Now I just needed to figure out how to find the north star in my viewfinder in the pitch black and I’d be good to go. I decided to do some more research on star trail photography and try again the following night.

SECOND ATTEMPT

After reading up on star trail photography, I had a new confidence and a new approach for my second night of shooting. The skies were clear and I’d be able to get my great star trail picture (and maybe even two!). I headed outside with my tripod earlier than the previous night to set a basic composition and focus while it was still light out. I now knew how to find the north star, and as soon as it was dark enough to see it I would recompose to include it in the frame. I still wanted to include some of the trees, but needed to make sure I painted them effectively with my flashlight. And I planned to take a 30 minute exposure to allow the trails to get a little more length. That means each shot would take an hour, so I figured I might get two before I needed to go to bed.

Around 10:30pm I headed back out, found the north star and tried to recompose the shot. I still couldn’t see through the viewfinder and had to guess that my composition was on the mark. I pressed the shutter button and crossed my fingers. Here’s what I saw on my LCD screen an hour later.

Night Sky-1

Ok, not perfect, but better. The north star was a little too high in my frame, and the light-painted trees looked like crap, but it was definitely better than the night before. I recomposed (simply moving the camera up) and decided to keep my flashlight in my pocket. I pressed the shutter release again and checked my result an hour later.

Night Sky-2

Shoot. Still not quite what I wanted. This time there weren’t enough trees in the frame, and if you are picky (and I am) you will notice a stray star trail at the bottom of the frame. That’s a satellite flying through my shot. Thanks a bunch, space program.

I’ll be honest, at this point I was really disappointed. I was also exhausted and called it quits for the night. “I guess I’ll try again tomorrow,” I thought.

THIRD ATTEMPT

Unfortunately the next night was cloudy, and the one after that, and the one after that. It was nice to return to my normal sleeping schedule, but I was beginning to wonder if I’d have another chance before it was time to head home. Finally, just a few days before we were scheduled to leave, the sun set over a clear sky. At 10:30pm I headed out to my trusty tripod (which I had set up when it was still light out) and found the north star. Careful not to touch the focus ring on my camera (I had set the focus earlier in the evening, when I could still see), I placed the camera on the tripod and attempted to compose the shot. This time I wanted the north star in the center of the frame, if possible. Knowing I’d only be able to see the silhouette of the trees in the viewfinder I marked in the treeline directly beneath the north star and composed my shot accordingly. Again, I left my flashlight in my pocket, knowing that no additional light was needed. I pressed my shutter release and waited.

Star Shots 3-2

Finally, a shot I felt good about. This is more along the lines of what I was looking for. Yes, I would rather the trees only be in the bottom of the frame (I don’t like that one on the right) and I’d rather have the north star higher in the frame, but that could be fixed simply by cropping the photo differently. I headed back into Lightroom and a couple of adjustments later, I had what I wanted.

Star Shots 3-2 crop

After three frustrating attempts at astrophotography, I was happy. To celebrate, and to mix things up a little, I decided to take another star point shot.

Star Shots 3-3

And then tried one more star trail shot before bed. This exposure was shorter (only 15 minutes) and I faced the camera to the east, including some of the house in the bottom of the frame for context. Unfortunately there was a bit of fog on my lens, so it didn’t turn out as I had hoped.

Star Shots 3-4

Fortunately, or unfortunately, the clouds rolled in after this shot, preventing me from trying again. That was fine with me, I needed the sleep anyway.

Comments

  1. Allan Schott says:

    I love your pictures. You need to start selling prints. I am amazed at the night sky. Where I live there is so much light pollution, we don’t see much. I also never realized the stars moved that much in an hour (though it makes sense).

    • Kate says:

      Allan – actually the shutter was only open for 30 minutes for those longest shots. I say it takes an hour because there is a special process in the camera (called “long exposure noise reduction”) that makes your camera inoperable right after the shot (although the shutter is closed) for the same amount of time of the exposure. So, if you take a 10 minute exposure with this function on you need 10 minutes for the shutter to be open and then another 10 minutes for the camera to complete the process. So, basically it takes 20 minutes to take a 10 minute exposure.

      That may be too photo nerdy for you, in which case I apologize, but I just thought I’d explain. And isn’t it amazing how much they appear to move (really it’s the earth moving)?!

  2. joshtrudell says:

    Great post. I’m looking forward to trying some astrophotography myself this fall, on a trip out to west Texas.

    • Kate says:

      Josh – let me know how it turns out for you. I’d be curious to see your results.

      It’s funny, while I found this photography maddening, I’d like to try it again soon to see if I can get even better results.

  3. Aunt Mary says:

    Kate, I like that last star point shot best. That’s what the sky there really looks like!!

    • Kate says:

      I have to admit, I also like that one the best. It is what the sky really looks like! It’s hard to remember that now that I’ve been living in an urban area, but it’s so gorgeous to see. Now I really want to head up to Northern Minnesota in the winter to see (and try to photograph) the northern lights.

  4. Great Photos – Happy Monday:)

  5. Victoria says:

    My favorite is your third attempt. Awesome!

  6. Sue says:

    Wow! I had no idea how spectacular the night sky is without light pollution. Great shots, Kate. I admire your persistence!

  7. Jessica says:

    I agree with Aunt Mary about the star point shot. Alexander really loves the photos. Do you think you could send me some of the files so I can have them printed up for the walls in his room? (It is currently a “solar system” theme, so these would be perfect!)

  8. Jessica says:

    And I agree with Allan. You should start a shop on Etsy or somewhere and start selling prints.

  9. Erin says:

    I think your star track photos are amazing! Also, I have a great memory of seeing the milky way for the first and only time with you, your dad and Andy out there

    • Kate says:

      I remember hanging out with you guys looking at the stars too! There was that eerily warm breeze that creeped me out. I was telling V all about it while we were up there. Hope you are well!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 471 other followers

%d bloggers like this: